Wednesday, January 18, 2017

Exclusive: Trump Operative Roger Stone Survives Assassination Attempt

Doctors suspect longtime political adviser poisoned with radioactive substance used to murder spies



Former Trump adviser Roger Stone was recently targeted for assassination, he revealed on the Tuesday edition of the Alex Jones Show.

The renowned Republican operative says he’s usually very healthy, but became violently ill unexpectedly several weeks ago.

“I am generally a healthy person. I have been a runner and a weight lifter. I am very careful in my diet. I’m a user of the Infowars supplements. I have been treated with acupuncture by perhaps the greatest acupuncturist in the state of Florida if not the United States,” Stone told radio host Alex Jones.

Stone went on to describe that his symptoms presented themselves first as a “routine stomach virus,” but that he eventually grew “exceedingly ill.”
“So I ultimately went to the doctors at Mt. Sinai hospital in Miami Beach, my own personal physician. They conducted extensive blood tests. Those blood tests were passed on to CDC.”

“The general consensus is that I was poisoned,” Stone says.

“I was poisoned with, they now say, a substance that may have been polonium or had the characteristics of polonium. This made me exceedingly ill. The conjecture of all the doctors was that I did not receive a large enough dose to kill me, but I have never been this ill.”

Polonium-210 is a radioactive substance that releases extremely harmful alpha particles throughout the body producing cancer-causing free radicals. It has been used in numerous high profile assassinations, including that of former KGB spy Alexander Litvinenko, and was suspected in the death of former PLO leader Yassar Arafat.

Stone went on to contemplate who may have been behind the possible assassination attempt, fingering Democrat opposition and the intel community.
“Who would want to do this to me? I am an enemy of the deep state. I think people know that I was an insider in American politics I was close to power in nine presidential elections. Everything Glenn Greenwald says [about the “deep state”] is true,” Stone claimed, referring to a recent The Intercept article which outlined how the intelligence community is attempting to stifle Trump.

“The Republican/Democrat Bush Clinton deep state has manufactured this Russia fraud. They have compounded it by pushing a clearly fabricated document.”

“Perhaps the fact that I’m effective on behalf of my beliefs has something to do with it,” Stone theorizes.

James Okeefe Exposes Leftist Terror Threats

Dear Doctor Trowbridge.....


from Anna Von Reitz

The Final Straw from Dr. John Parks Trowbridge: 
I want all of my readers to read this updated posting from Dr. Trowbridge.  For the past three years he has been dueling with the so-called "federal courts" which are indeed nothing more than corporate municipal courts and are not vested with any authority related to us, our states, or our judicial powers. 
Dr. Trowbridge has exposed the seedy underbelly of the "UNITED STATES" incorporated, which is nothing but a private, for-profit, mostly foreign-owned governmental services corporation operated by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) on our shores, and he has also exposed the treasonous "Oath Tampering" of its Board of Directors, masquerading as members of a legitimate and lawfully organized "Congress" in 1991.
Indeed, John Parks Trowbridge has fought the good fight.
The one aspect of this circumstance which he has not taken into consideration is that all their actions against him and against other Americans depend upon falsification of public records (Birth Certificates) enabling these Grifters to "presume" that we are all "voluntarily submitting" to their municipal jurisdiction and that we are not owed the guarantees of the actual Constitution as a result. 
We are not now and the vast majority of us have never been either "United States Citizens" (Territorial Citizens) nor "citizens of the United States" (Municipal CITIZENS)---but our names have been "registered" as such and we have been falsely held under the legal presumptions that apply in that foreign international jurisdiction as a result. 
Unable to change or overcome our actual Constitution, the treasonous corporate vermin have instead connived to mischaracterize each one of us and to falsely claim that we have knowingly and willingly volunteered to serve as "citizens" in their "democracy" instead of living as non-citizen American state nationals in the republic we are owed. 
And that fundamental fraud is what underlies all that Dr. Trowbridge and many other honest Americans have detected and experienced.  These dishonest "courts" are not offering to try John Parks Trowbridge, but a corporate franchise ACCOUNT named after him: JOHN PARKS TROWBRIDGE, or a bankrupt public utility franchise ACCOUNT also named after him: JOHN P. TROWBRIDGE by the perpetrators of this vast, convoluted scheme.
Congressional Record: June 13, 1967, pp. 15641-15646------ "A "citizen of the United States" is a civilly dead entity operating as a co-trustee and co-beneficiary of the PCT (Public Charitable Trust set up for the welfare of freed plantation slaves in the wake of the Civil War), the private constructive, cestui que vie trust of US Inc. under the 14th Amendment, which upholds the debt of the USA and US Inc. in Section 4.
There--- once and for all --- in plain English--- is what a "citizen of the United States" is: a dead legal fiction entity presumed to be operating as a recipient of federal corporation welfare benefits in exchange for guaranteeing ( underwriting and acting as a surety for) the debts of the USA, Inc. and the US, Inc., both.
There, too, is the explanation of how you are being enslaved and "presumed upon" by these vermin.  As a "citizen of the United States" you are on the hook for paying their debts and presumed to be operating a public trust franchise, a Cestui Que Vie constructive trust named after you under the JOHN PARKS TROWBRIDGE ACCOUNT or to be a bankrupt public transmitting utility franchise operating under the JOHN P. TROWBRIDGE ACCOUNT.  
These criminals are getting away with these frauds and deceits and operating these "courts" as private debt collection agencies in behalf of the creditors of "JOHN PARKS TROWBRIDGE" (benefiting the US, Inc.) and "JOHN P.TROWBRIDGE" (which isn't even a legal name for lack of specificity, benefiting the USA, Inc.) under color of law. 
This has been going on for 150 years, ever since the close of the so-called "American Civil War" which was never declared and which was never ended by any peace treaty and which is therefore nothing but an illegal and illicit commercial mercenary action on our shores.
They have usurped upon our rightful jurisdiction----the land and the undelegated portion of international jurisdiction, too---and promoted global enslavement and false indebtedness--via the pernicious practice of registering people as "things"---- Cestui Que Vie trusts and bankrupt public transmitting utility franchises---without the victim's knowledge or consent. They seize upon us when we are babies in our cradles, force our Mothers to sign undisclosed contracts, and register our given names as franchises of corporations indebted to them. 
And, because there is no law against enslaving a corporate fiction or robbing a corporate fiction or falsely arresting a corporate fiction, they have made very merry on our shores, operating this con game and substituting their private corporation for the public government we are owed. 
Doctor Trowbridge, you are wasting your time making arguments "in Law" against vermin operating "at law".  In their fraudulent system of things, JOHN PARKS TROWBRIDGE has already consented to their municipal jurisdiction and submitted his body, soul, and any other assets he may have or earn to serve their benefit and not his own.  In their fraudulent system of things, JOHN PARKS TROWBRIDGE has owed an insurmountable debt from the day of his birth---which is not the day you were born, but the date your given name was registered (filed) as property belonging to them and offered for the benefit of their creditors.  In their fraudulent, foreign system of things, JOHN PARKS TROWBRIDGE is --- by definition --- a criminal, already convicted, and all that is left for them to discuss is how much he owes their masters and how long they may put him in jail.
And now, without further adieu, may we all agree that the Pope and the British Monarch and the Lord Mayor of London, all of whom have acted in Gross International Breach of Trust with respect to the America people since 1822, are to be recognized as criminals for creating and promoting and using and abusing this system of fraud and mischaracterization and operating it throughout the world?  That they are to be universally condemned for the practice of preying upon helpless babies and alleging false and self-interested contracts against them and their parents? 
Dear Doctor Trowbridge, I could weep for the beauty of your logic and your research, because except for the erudition of the ignorant concerning what should be honored by any honest court--- I know it is beyond hope to expect these private bill collection agencies being run as courts under color of law to respond to your complaint.
Even among the Bar Association Members bright enough to understand what you are saying, there isn't the courage or the honor or the strength of character necessary for these men and women to denounce what has gone on here. To do so would be to admit their own guilt and without the power to guarantee their safety, you cannot expect them to yield.  At most you may expect a private settlement and the dismissal of any charges held against you, the return of your house, and a quick sideways scuttle like cockroaches fleeing the light. 

And that, I think, is not your object, Sir.  I think that you, like me, are determined to see correction of this entire system of things and that nothing but an end to business as usual for these con artists will do. 
See this article and over 400 others on Anna's website

Obama has issued at least 19 secret directives

Obama has issued  at least 19  secret  directives

Obama has issued a form of executive action known as the 'presidential' memorandum more often than any other president in history - using it to take unilateral action even as he has signed fewer executive orders.

Gregory Korte
June 24, 2015

WASHINGTON — A one-digit correction to President Obama's directive on hostage policy Wednesday had the effect of disclosing the existence of a previously unknown — and still-secret — Obama order on national security.

The hostage policy was originally released Wednesday as a presidential policy directive numbered PPD-29. When the White House corrected that number to PPD-30, it meant Obama had issued a secret directive as PPD-29 sometime in the past 17 months.

Obama signed PPD-28, an order on electronic eavesdropping in the wake of revelations by Edward Snowden, in January 2014.

So what is PPD-29? No one's talking. A spokesman for the National Security Council declined to comment of the existence of classified PPDs Wednesday.

"The only reason we know about it is the sequential numbering of the directives, and realizing they skipped a few," said Steven Aftergood of the Federation of American Scientists which tracks the directives.

PPD-29 isn't the first to be tacitly acknowledged only by a missing number. Of the 30 PPDs issued by Obama, 19 have not been released and for 11 of those, the White House has not disclosed even the subject of the order.

"It's not only the public that doesn't have copies. It's also Congress that doesn't have copies," Aftergood said. "It's a domain of largely unchecked presidential authority. It doesn't mean it's bad, but it's lacking in independent oversight."  But they have the same legal force as an executive order, forming a body of largely secret law, said Harold Relyea, a political scientist who advised Congress on national security directives before retiring from the Congressional Research Service.

"The difference is that while executive orders are public by law — they must be published in the Federal Register to be effective —- PPDs are not," he said. "It is a kind of secret law. People have to obey it. But it's a directive that can allocate money, direct people or take a course of action."

What Obama calls PPDs have gone by different names by different presidents back to the Truman Administration. President George W. Bush called them National Security Presidential Directives (NPSDs). President Clinton called them Presidential Decision Directives (PDDs). President Nixon called them National Security Decision Memoranda.

Whatever they're called, Obama has been less prolific than his predecessors. George W. Bush issued 66 such orders, plus 25 more Homeland Security Presidential Directives. President Reagan issued at least 325.
Some, going back as far as the Lyndon Johnson administration, remain classified. They can involve subjects including the use of nuclear weapons, ballistic missile defenses, space policy, cybersecurity and even continuity plans for the federal government in the case of a large-scale disaster.

The secrecy makes it difficult to know entirely what changes Obama has made in the hostage policy. The directive issued Wednesday revoked a prior directive by President George W. Bush in 2002. But that directive, known as NSPD-12, remains secret.  "You would think that if there's a new policy it would be a simple matter to explain what the old policy was," Aftergood said.

And even though Obama released his directive, it incorporates a classified annex with additional instructions to executive branch agencies.

And WHO?  And WHAT?  Specific individuals and organizations proposed and even authored these directives?  And are these to be used against Americans?  And specifically Christians?  WHY all the SECRECY from one who is well known to be anti-America and anti-'white'?

Michelle Obama Claims Men Find Her 'Sexy'

Michelle Obama
Claims Men Find Her 'Sexy'
Then Gets a Brutal Wake-Up Call

January 17, 2017
Amanda Shea

Can we get a ‘NO’ on this, please? We’ve heard a lot of the ‘same-old, same-old’ come from 'Michelle' (according to Obama - 'Michael aka 'Mikie'), but this, this is a new low. Just check out the speech. It’s pretty silly.

While bragging about herself and the accomplishments she’s had in life, she described how she had to overcome a lot simply for being a 'woman'. She whined that she wasn’t taken seriously because of her 'gender' and that anything she had to say was often disregarded because 'men only saw her for her body'.

 'Michelle Obama' is a MAN!

Carrying on that note, she said she couldn’t walk down the street without 'being gawked at', that 'men would practically swarm her, hoping for a look and perhaps even a grope'.
The thought of that actually happening, which is doubtful, is as gross as she looks to the rest of us.
The  speech was supposed to empower women with a message that they can do anything they set their minds to, but got derailed by 'her' arrogance about having succeeded despite being sexy in a “man’s world.”
There was no reason to go off on that tangent when the crowd can see 'her' in person and know 'she’s' lying by looking at 'her'.

No sooner did 'she' get the words out, a recording of 'her' nauseating speech leaked and has gone viral by repulsed people who are shocked that 'she' would have the audacity to say she 'has sex appeal', which is a classless new low even for 'Michelle'

Published on Jan 9, 2017
Michelle Obama is known as one of the ugliest, most classless first ladies we have ever had. That’s why millions of viewers all over the world knew Michelle was lying on Thursday when she claimed that men used to whistle at her in a sexual manner when she walked down the street.

Yeah right, Moochelle.

“As I got older, I found that men would whistle at me as I walked down the street, as if my body were their property, as if I were an object to be commented on instead of a full human being with thoughts and feelings of my own,” Michelle said during a speech in Argentina, according to Daily Mail.

“I began to realize that the hopes I had for myself were in conflict with the messages I was receiving from people around me,” she added as she promoted her Let Girls Learn initiative.

Here are some of Michelle’s “sexiest” photos that may have gotten her whistled at.

Nice try, Michelle, but nobody is buying that you were EVER anything close to a sex symbol! 

Tuesday, January 17, 2017

Kent Dunn: "Important Message to Light Workers and White Knights"! Meet the Fake Valerie Jarrett !!

Kent Dunn: "Important Message to 
Light Workers and White Knights"! 
Meet the Fake Valerie Jarrett !! 

Published on Jan 17, 2017

Judge Jeanine Slams Lewis and O'Donnell Trump Comments

Judge Jeanine Slams John Lewis, 
Rosie O'Donnell Over Trump Comments

There is something SERIOUSLY WRONG with Rosie: "Rosie O'Donnell Supports 'Martial Law' to Delay Trump's Inauguration".  A full blown wackjob, Rosie  needs to be committed to a mental hospital long term. (

This week on "Justice", Judge Jeanine Pirro fired back at Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.) over his claims Donald Trump is not a legitimate president-elect, and criticized comedian Rosie O'Donnell for her recent comments about the New York businessman.

'Mentally Unstable Rosie O'Donnell'
Judge Jeanine Pirro

Lewis, 76, a longtime Atlanta representative and a Civil Rights era leader, told NBC that Russian meddling in the 2016 election delegitimized Trump's win and said he will not attend the inauguration.

"Pray tell, Congressman, what's not legitimate?" Pirro asked, "Trump won by a large electoral college margin and, in spite of efforts to do a recount, nothing changed."

Pirro noted Lewis' experience in the Civil Rights movement where he fought for "equal rights and equal justice", and was 'rewarded' with a 30-year tenure in Congress, but questioned why Lewis would not extend the same reward to Trump.

"Did you not take an oath to support the Constitution? You, a Congressman for 30 years, know how to amend the Constitution if you don't like it."

Of O'Donnell, Pirro said the actress should never have made even a passing reference to instituting "martial law" to prevent Trump's inauguration.

O'Donnell has a long history of negative encounters and a mental state that identifies her as a hard line communist and traitor to this nation. This woman should be investigated for possible counts of treason. She does not exhibit even one cell of loyalty to the united States.

RREST Obama NOW FOR TREASON!!! Valerie Jarrett’s Real Identity Revealed

Shocking News From The Pentagon! 
Obama’s Chief Advisor 
Valerie Jarrett’s Real Identity Revealed
NOW we KNOW WHY Obama sent
IRAN as much as *$33.6 BILLION!!! 

The Doctor of Common Sense

Note the hammer and sickle pen on the left lapel
Look at the stars on the collar and epaulets
Published on Jan 14, 2017
Shocking News From The Pentagon! Obama’s Chief Advisor Valerie Jarrett’s Real Identity Revealed, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad


Judge Jeanine Pirro OUTRAGED

What in the world is going on 
with the African American population?
Have they gone stark raving mad?

Published on Jan 12, 2017

Souvenirs in Wash DC

Souvenirs in Wash DC

To say that this message is priceless, well, is quite an understatement!!!

To say that this MESSAGE is PRICELESS, well, is QUITE AN UNDERSTATEMENT !!!!

Twas the Night Before Inauguration!

Twas the night before Inauguration, and up in the tower,  The Donald reflected on his newfound power.
The conservative masses had come out in force,  And delivered a victory that would chart a new course.
The snowflakes were shell-shocked with tears in their eyes,  The media lied to them . . . What a surprise.
They had been promised a Hillary win,
But the criminal Clinton took one on the chin.
And though from all corners celebrities flew,  They made no impression, for they hadn’t a clue.
They talked about climate, racism, and such,  And they made up good stories . . . But didn’t know much.
The fake news and ignorance came at a cost,  And they can’t understand all the reasons they lost.
They blame it on Comey and Bernie and Vlad,  But fail to acknowledge the one that was bad.
Yes, Hillary Clinton, in many ways flawed,  Was her own biggest hurdle toward getting the nod.
The campaign exposed her corruptness and greed,  And her speeches were punch-less as ten dollar weed.
So out in the streets there arose such a clatter,  It was Soros-paid protestors and Black Lives Matter.
With cities to pillage and windows to smash,  They knew not the issues, but needed the cash.
Eight years of Obama had given them cause,  To expect a replacement of their Santa Claus.
But soon the protestors will feel the pain,  When the wheels fall off of the old gravy train.
And now all the snowflakes are riddled with fear,  Upset and offended by things that they’ll hear.
The cocoa and crayons will help for a while,  But fact-based opinions will soon cramp their style.
I originally supported, and voted, for Cruz,  In the end, I would vote for whoever they choose.
He wasn’t my first choice, but soon I would cede,  The one they call Trump is the one that we need.
I saw him on TV in front of a crowd,
He spoke about veterans, it made me feel proud.
He spoke about energy, safety, and jobs,  Taking this country back from the Washington snobs.
He was dressed in Armani, all tailored and neat,  And the Brunos he wore made the outfit complete.

For a man of his vintage, he seemed rather fit,  And he looked presidential, I have to admit.
His eyes glowed like embers, his smile was the best,  And his hair was the color of my old hunting vest.
His love for this country was on full display,  And his actions spoke louder than his words could say.
He thanked all his voters, and before he was gone,  Saved thousands of jobs while Obama looked on.
The fate of this country left nothing to chance,  So, he filled out his cabinet weeks in advance.
The men he had chosen were of the same mind,  Let’s set the bar high, and not lead from behind.
He picked up his phone as he rose from his seat,  With a flick of his finger, he sent out this tweet;
“Now Mattis!, now Kelly!’ now Sessions! And Pruitt!
 On Perry! On Flynn, You’re the ones who can do it.
 Start lifting restrictions and building the wall,  Now dash away! Dash away! Dash away all!”;
The roar of his audience rose from the stands,  He kissed all their babies and shook all their hands.
He answered their questions and calmed all their fears,  They knew it would be a fantastic four years.
Then he jumped in his limo, and off to his jet,  A fellow that Liberals won’t soon forget.
He sent one more tweet as the evening expired; “Happy Inauguration to all,  AND OBAMA – YOU’RE FIRED!”

Organization Offers $2.5k to Protest Trump Inauguration

Report: ‘Grassroots’ Organization Offers $2.5k to Protest Trump Inauguration


Online job postings claim to provide travel expenses, insurance benefits to 'operatives'

Thousands of Criminal Illegal Immigrants Sent Home

Thousands of Criminal Illegal Immigrants Sent Home After Apprehension at Southwest Border


Audit faults Border Patrol for lax oversight of consequences for criminal illegal immigrants


Morgan Chalfant

January 17 2017


Nearly 4,000 illegal immigrants apprehended by U.S. Border Patrol at the southwest border over a three-year period were allowed to return to their home countries despite having past criminal convictions and connections to criminal networks.

The statistic is included in a new government audit exposing shortcomings in the way Border Patrol agents deal with illegal immigrants caught trying to cross the border into the United States.

Border Patrol agents use the Consequence Delivery System, or CDS, to classify apprehended aliens using seven criminal and noncriminal categories. They then decide which of eight consequences the apprehended aliens should receive, based on how effective the consequences are in preventing the individuals from trying again to illegally enter the United States. The CDS system plays a major role in the Department of Homeland Security’s efforts to combat transnational criminal organizations and drug smuggling across the U.S. border.

However, Border Patrol agents incorrectly classified roughly 15,000 criminal alien apprehensions between fiscal years 2013-15, according to a Government Accountability Office report issued this month. Twenty-four percent of these aliens, or 3,717, were allowed to voluntarily return to their countries of origin. Voluntary return is rated as the least effective and efficient of the consequences. More severe consequences include criminal prosecution.

“Our analysis showed that criminal aliens not classified in accordance with agency guidance were less likely to face prosecution and more likely to be voluntarily returned to their home country than criminal aliens overall,” the GAO investigation concluded.

Border Patrol agents were less likely in 2015 to choose the most effective and efficient consequences in cases of apprehended aliens. Agents’ use of these consequences declined from 28 percent in fiscal 2013 to 18 percent in 2015; data from fiscal 2016 was not available to auditors.

“Border Patrol has not assessed reasons for the relatively low application of consequences determined to be the Most Effective and Efficient consequence in each sector; but some agency officials stated that challenges include agents’ hesitation to apply consequences that require referral to federal partners facing capacity constraints, such as Department of Justice immigration courts,” the GAO wrote.

Auditors found that Border Patrol significantly underestimated the recidivism rate for apprehended aliens, which the department uses to measure the performance of the CDS process. According to GAO’s analysis, 29 percent of past offenders were apprehended again in fiscal 2015, compared with the 14 percent recidivism rate reported by Border Patrol for the same time period.

Auditors recommended that Border Patrol more accurately measure recidivism, collect testimony on why agents don’t apply consequences rated most effective and efficient, and boost oversight of the CDS process.

Rep. Michael McCaul (R., Texas), who chairs the House Committee on Homeland Security, told the Washington Free Beacon that he plans to follow up with the department on its implementation of GAO’s recommendations.

“The CBP needs to better measure the effectiveness of the consequences it provides to aliens who cross the border illegally to prevent recidivism,” McCaul said on Monday. “This report provides several recommendations to that end, and I will be following up with CBP to ensure it implements those recommendations.”

The audit was issued days after retired Marine Gen. John Kelly, President-elect Donald Trump’s choice to oversee immigration and the border as secretary of homeland security, appeared before the Senate for his confirmation hearing.

Kelly, a former commander of the U.S. Southern Command, underscored the need to staunch the flow of drugs and people across the southern border with a “layered defense” that includes human patrols, sensors, and cooperation with neighboring countries like Mexico. Kelly said that a “physical barrier” like a border wall, the cornerstone of Trump’s campaign rhetoric on immigration, would not be enough on its own to secure the border.

Border Patrol agents caught more than 1.1 million aliens along the southwest border over the three-year period covered by the audit. They apprehended roughly 300,000 in fiscal 2015 alone.


"CHOICE" || Spoken Word Poetry

Published on Jan 9, 2017
Abortion destroys precious individuals who are made in the image of God. “Choice,” a riveting Spoken Word poetry video by Living Waters President, Emeal (“E.Z.”) Zwayne, drives this urgent truth home, and holds up the glorious gospel as our only hope and remedy.  Please watch it, and share it, for the sake of lives and souls. Watch our related movie, “180,” freely online (over 5 million views):
Emeal (“E.Z.”) Zwayne Bio:
SUBSCRIBE to get the latest:
You have our joyous permission to show this in your church or event. (You can download an HD version of this video at:

BREAKING: Clinton Foundation Layoffs!

BREAKING: Clinton Collapse! Foundation Laying Off Numerous Staffers

It appears that, at long last, the Clinton Foundation is discovering that trading influence for money doesn’t work out so well when you don’t have any influence to trade.
 Clinton Collapse
Foundation Preps for Massive Layoffs!



It appears that, at long last, the Clinton Foundation is discovering that trading influence for money doesn’t work out so well when you don’t have any influence to trade.

According to The Daily Caller, 22 staffers are being laid off at the Clinton Global Initiative, one of the multifarious tentacles of the Clinton Foundation. The layoffs will be effective as of April 15, a filing from the group said.
Politico reported on the announcement of layoffs back in September, before the election.

The layoffs come as an investigation by the FBI into the Clinton Foundation is in full swing. Many allege that the foundation was used as little more than a slush fund for the Clinton family, all the while peddling influence during Hillary Clinton’s time at the State Department.

The foundation has also been suffering with cash flow problems since Hillary Clinton’s swan dive at the polls back in November. Apparently, there aren’t too many satrapies willing to pay either Clinton for access when there’s not much access to be bought. Who would have thunk it?

The Clinton Global Initiative was one of the more nebulous arms of the Clinton Foundation. According to its website, CGI “convenes global leaders to create and implement innovative solutions to the world’s most pressing challenges.” In other words, it manages conferences. At its height, the Clinton Global Initiative employed about 200 people.

There’s nothing quite as satisfying as seeing heads roll at the Clinton Foundation, even if it’s a bit late in the day for it. We can only hope that the Clinton family’s sick slush fund is dismantled and that the former first family is no longer able to peddle their influence. In the absence of that, however, 22 people being laid off is certainly a good start. We can only hope there’s more to come.

H/T Breitbart

Monday, January 16, 2017

Moody's Caught Robbing the People Blind, Gets Fined and Allowed to Stay ...

James O’Keefe of Project Veritas has blown the lid off Anti-Trumpers planning to use criminal acts to stop the Presidential Inauguration.

We’ve heard about possible acts by liberal snowflakes to disrupt the Presidential inauguration in bits and pieces on social media, nothing of source, but this video does it and brings everything to light. These men, if they are not arrested, should be immediately and anyone connected with them over the past few months.

There’s a reason why Project Veritas continues to be at the forefront of journalism, and that is because they are willing to put it all on the line to get to the truth. They are not just tweeting conspiracies and trying to increase their social media following. They are in this to expose and fix, and that’s admirable.

If you are unable to watch this on your mobile device, please click here:

Some Election Interference is More Equal Than Others – How Ukraine Meddled on Behalf of Clinton

Source: Michael Krieger, Liberty Blitzkrieg

A couple of days ago, Politico published a fascinating piece describing how factions associated with the current Ukrainian government apparently interfered in the U.S. election on behalf of Hillary Clinton. The findings seem pretty damning, and certainly warrant at least some conversation within the American media given the 24/7 obsession with Russia. Nevertheless, most of you have probably never heard of this saga, since when it comes to the corporate media news cycle, some election interference is more equal than others.

The article is lengthy, and can be confusing at times given all the moving parts, but I highly encourage you to read it. Ukrainian interference in the election can be traced to essentially two sources. First, there was the apparent collaboration between the Ukrainian embassy in Washington D.C. and a highly paid Ukrainian-American DNC consultant, Alexandra Chalupa. The second angle is far more disturbing, and involves the publicization of a so-called ledger demonstrating corruption between Paul Manafort and pro-Russian elements in Ukraine, by a parliamentarian named Serhiy Leshchenko. Bizarrely, the investigation was effectively dropped after Trump won the election, making you wonder if there was anything really there in the first place.
What follows are excerpts from the excellent piece, Ukrainian Efforts to Sabotage Trump Backfire:
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found. 

A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation. 

The Ukrainian efforts had an impact in the race, helping to force Manafort’s resignation and advancing the narrative that Trump’s campaign was deeply connected to Ukraine’s foe to the east, Russia. But they were far less concerted or centrally directed than Russia’s alleged hacking and dissemination of Democratic emails.

Politico’s investigation found evidence of Ukrainian government involvement in the race that appears to strain diplomatic protocol dictating that governments refrain from engaging in one another’s elections.

The Ukrainian antipathy for Trump’s team — and alignment with Clinton’s — can be traced back to late 2013. That’s when the country’s president, Viktor Yanukovych, whom Manafort had been advising, abruptly backed out of a European Union pact linked to anti-corruption reforms. Instead, Yanukovych entered into a multibillion-dollar bailout agreement with Russia, sparking protests across Ukraine and prompting Yanukovych to flee the country to Russia under Putin’s protection. 

In the ensuing crisis, Russian troops moved into the Ukrainian territory of Crimea, and Manafort dropped off the radar. 

Manafort’s work for Yanukovych caught the attention of a veteran Democratic operative named Alexandra Chalupa, who had worked in the White House Office of Public Liaison during the Clinton administration. Chalupa went on to work as a staffer, then as a consultant, for Democratic National Committee. The DNC paid her $412,000 from 2004 to June 2016, according to Federal Election Commission records, though she also was paid by other clients during that time, including Democratic campaigns and the DNC’s arm for engaging expatriate Democrats around the world.
She said she shared her concern with Ukraine’s ambassador to the U.S., Valeriy Chaly, and one of his top aides, Oksana Shulyar, during a March 2016 meeting at the Ukrainian Embassy. According to someone briefed on the meeting, Chaly said that Manafort was very much on his radar, but that he wasn’t particularly concerned about the operative’s ties to Trump since he didn’t believe Trump stood much of a chance of winning the GOP nomination, let alone the presidency.

Chalupa said the embassy also worked directly with reporters researching Trump, Manafort and Russia to point them in the right directions. She added, though, “they were being very protective and not speaking to the press as much as they should have. I think they were being careful because their situation was that they had to be very, very careful because they could not pick sides. It’s a political issue, and they didn’t want to get involved politically because they couldn’t.” 

Shulyar vehemently denied working with reporters or with Chalupa on anything related to Trump or Manafort, explaining “we were stormed by many reporters to comment on this subject, but our clear and adamant position was not to give any comment [and] not to interfere into the campaign affairs.”

Shulyar said her work with Chalupa “didn’t involve the campaign,” and she specifically stressed that “We have never worked to research and disseminate damaging information about Donald Trump and Paul Manafort.” 

But Andrii Telizhenko, who worked as a political officer in the Ukrainian Embassy under Shulyar, said she instructed him to help Chalupa research connections between Trump, Manafort and Russia. “Oksana said that if I had any information, or knew other people who did, then I should contact Chalupa,” recalled Telizhenko, who is now a political consultant in Kiev. “They were coordinating an investigation with the Hillary team on Paul Manafort with Alexandra Chalupa,” he said, adding “Oksana was keeping it all quiet,” but “the embassy worked very closely with” Chalupa. 
In fact, sources familiar with the effort say that Shulyar specifically called Telizhenko into a meeting with Chalupa to provide an update on an American media outlet’s ongoing investigation into Manafort. 

Telizhenko recalled that Chalupa told him and Shulyar that, “If we can get enough information on Paul [Manafort] or Trump’s involvement with Russia, she can get a hearing in Congress by September.”
Sure seems like pretty close coordination between a DNC consultant and the official embassy of Ukraine in the midst of a Presidential election.
Nevertheless, that’s small potatoes compared to what happened within the Ukrainian parliament itself. As Politico notes:
While it’s not uncommon for outside operatives to serve as intermediaries between governments and reporters, one of the more damaging Russia-related stories for the Trump campaign — and certainly for Manafort — can be traced more directly to the Ukrainian government. 

Documents released by an independent Ukrainian government agency — and publicized by a parliamentarian — appeared to show $12.7 million in cash payments that were earmarked for Manafort by the Russia-aligned party of the deposed former president, Yanukovych. 

The New York Times, in the August story revealing the ledgers’ existence, reported that the payments earmarked for Manafort were “a focus” of an investigation by Ukrainian anti-corruption officials, while CNN reported days later that the FBI was pursuing an overlapping inquiry.

Clinton’s campaign seized on the story to advance Democrats’ argument that Trump’s campaign was closely linked to Russia. The ledger represented “more troubling connections between Donald Trump’s team and pro-Kremlin elements in Ukraine,” Robby Mook, Clinton’s campaign manager, said in a statement. He demanded that Trump “disclose campaign chair Paul Manafort’s and all other campaign employees’ and advisers’ ties to Russian or pro-Kremlin entities, including whether any of Trump’s employees or advisers are currently representing and or being paid by them.” 

A former Ukrainian investigative journalist and current parliamentarian named Serhiy Leshchenko, who was elected in 2014 as part of Poroshenko’s party, held a news conference to highlight the ledgers, and to urge Ukrainian and American law enforcement to aggressively investigate Manafort. 

“I believe and understand the basis of these payments are totally against the law — we have the proof from these books,” Leshchenko said during the news conference, which attracted international media coverage. “If Mr. Manafort denies any allegations, I think he has to be interrogated into this case and prove his position that he was not involved in any misconduct on the territory of Ukraine,” Leshchenko added. 
These are some really serious allegations, which makes his current behavior, which I’ll highlight later, that much more concerning.
Manafort denied receiving any off-books cash from Yanukovych’s Party of Regions, and said that he had never been contacted about the ledger by Ukrainian or American investigators, later telling POLITICO “I was just caught in the crossfire.”
The scrutiny around the ledgers — combined with that from other stories about his Ukraine work — proved too much, and he stepped down from the Trump campaign less than a week after the Times story.

At the time, Leshchenko suggested that his motivation was partly to undermine Trump. “For me, it was important to show not only the corruption aspect, but that he is [a] pro-Russian candidate who can break the geopolitical balance in the world,” Leshchenko told the Financial Times about two weeks after his news conference. The newspaper noted that Trump’s candidacy had spurred “Kiev’s wider political leadership to do something they would never have attempted before: intervene, however indirectly, in a U.S. election,” and the story quoted Leshchenko asserting that the majority of Ukraine’s politicians are “on Hillary Clinton’s side.”
Well, well, well…but there’s more.
An operative who has worked extensively in Ukraine, including as an adviser to Poroshenko, said it was highly unlikely that either Leshchenko or the anti-corruption bureau would have pushed the issue without at least tacit approval from Poroshenko or his closest allies. 
“It was something that Poroshenko was probably aware of and could have stopped if he wanted to,” said the operative. 

And, almost immediately after Trump’s stunning victory over Clinton, questions began mounting about the investigations into the ledgers — and the ledgers themselves. 

An official with the anti-corruption bureau told a Ukrainian newspaper, “Mr. Manafort does not have a role in this case.”
And, while the anti-corruption bureau told Politico late last month that a “general investigation [is] still ongoing” of the ledger, it said Manafort is not a target of the investigation. “As he is not the Ukrainian citizen, [the anti-corruption bureau] by the law couldn’t investigate him personally,” the bureau said in a statement.
Note that the only thing that changed is Trump won the election, which apparently caused the Ukrainian government to backtrack on the entire thing after its sabotage failed to deliver the desire outcome.
Some Poroshenko critics have gone further, suggesting that the bureau is backing away from investigating because the ledgers might have been doctored or even forged.
And in an interview this week, Manafort, who re-emerged as an informal advisor to Trump after Election Day, suggested that the ledgers were inauthentic and called their publication “a politically motivated false attack on me. My role as a paid consultant was public. There was nothing off the books, but the way that this was presented tried to make it look shady.”
As shameless as all of this is, it doesn’t end there.
Poroshenko’s allies are scrambling to figure out how to build a relationship with Trump, who is known for harboring and prosecuting grudges for years. 

A delegation of Ukrainian parliamentarians allied with Poroshenko last month traveled to Washington partly to try to make inroads with the Trump transition team, but they were unable to secure a meeting, according to a Washington foreign policy operative familiar with the trip. And operatives in Washington and Kiev say that after the election, Poroshenko met in Kiev with top executives from the Washington lobbying firm BGR — including Ed Rogers and Lester Munson — about how to navigate the Trump regime.

Weeks later, BGR reported to the Department of Justice that the government of Ukraine would pay the firm $50,000 a month to “provide strategic public relations and government affairs counsel,” including “outreach to U.S. government officials, non-government organizations, members of the media and other individuals.”
The fact that foreign influence is purchased like this is simply disgusting, but I digress.
In fact, I’ve saved the best for last…
The Poroshenko regime’s standing with Trump is considered so dire that the president’s allies after the election actually reached out to make amends with — and even seek assistance from — Manafort, according to two operatives familiar with Ukraine’s efforts to make inroads with Trump.
After essentially claiming that Manafort was a hired gun for Putin to intervene in the internal affairs of Ukraine, the government is now reaching out to him? You don’t have to be Sherlock Holmes to see something’s not adding up here. Was the entire investigation a fraud to help Hillary Clinton win the election? If so, isn’t that election interference?

Nevertheless, I somehow I doubt we’ll see America’s three stooges, Graham, Rubio and McCain make a big stink over this one.

If you enjoyed this post, and want to contribute to genuine, independent media, consider visiting our Support Page.

In Liberty,
Michael Krieger